But the Washington Post? That's a different matter entirely, and the folks there seem to agree that this might be the beginning of the White House's troubles. Libby could turn on the administration to save his own hide, and Cheney could likely be called to testify:
If Libby's case goes to trial, Addington and Hannah are only two of the many White House officials -- including Cheney himself -- who could be forced to testify about how they handled intelligence, dealt with the media and built the argument for the Iraq war, according to people close to the case. Republicans worry that Libby's court fight will force President Bush to deal with the prospect of top officials testifying and embarrassing disclosures of how the White House operates and treats critics.The piece continues with another bit of news that should put the clampdown on the idea that Turdblossom has escaped the Fitzgerald probe:
It is also possible, they note, that Libby will strike a plea agreement and avert a public trial. ...
Criminal defense lawyers say Cheney would probably be called as a witness in any trial, to verify and recount the conversation he had with Libby on June 12, 2003. At that time, Cheney allegedly told Libby that Plame worked in the CIA's Counterproliferation Division.
Fitzgerald appeared prepared to indict Rove heading into last week for making false statements, according to three people close to the probe. But that changed during a private meeting last Tuesday between Fitzgerald and Rove's attorney, Robert Luskin. It's not clear precisely what happened in that meeting, but two sources briefed on it said Luskin discussed new information that gave Fitzgerald "pause." ...To quote a great American who has served as the model for this president's thinking and speaking, "It ain't over 'til it's over."
Rove remains a focus of the CIA leak probe. He has told friends it is possible he still will be indicted for providing false statements to the grand jury.
"Everyone thinks it is over for Karl and they are wrong," a source close to Rove said. The strategist's legal and political advisers "by no means think the part of the investigation concerning Karl is closed."
6 comments:
If it really comes down to their butts vs. bad press (which will be explained away by lackeys), they will not hesitate for one second to pull out the pardon, or at least the promise of one in return for silence.
As I've said already, I think the legal jeopardy for the white house is over. However, the political jeopardy is still very much a factor. Even if Rove doesn't get indicted, he was very clearly in the know as "Official A." His butt has to be fired, or else Bush has committed another of his patented flip-flops.
I think Holden at First Draft has an intriguing idea: a dem senator should put a hold on Scalito's nomination until Cheney and co. come clean.
That's an interesting suggestion, and a nice little bit of political judo. Bush nominated Alito to take the spotlight off the Plame indictments, but Dems can now use Alito to put the pressure back on Bush.
I like it, but I doubt we'll see a Dem with the cojones to do it. Man, I miss Wellstone.
Billmon makes my point in a wittier fashion: http://billmon.org/archives/002323.html
Did anyone see that bit on the Daily Show last night where they discussed Fitzgerald's metaphor about baseball as it related to the indictment. Good god, that man is duller than dishwater!!!
Oh my gosh...I saw it, and it was ridiculous! Longest, most complex metaphor ever. Bleh.
Post a Comment