StudioDave caught this lovely image over at Inside Cable News -- and, no, I can't think of a scarier place to be than inside cable news -- and I thought we should pass it along.Maybe this is what the Republican talking heads mean when they insist it's somehow a Democratic scandal. They saw it on Fox News, so it must be true.
By the way, be sure to check out the comments over at the original site. People are mad because Foley's getting so much attention and no one talks about Patrick Kennedy anymore! Because driving drunk is the same thing as preying on children, engaging in cybersex with them, setting up dates where you get them drunk, and so on. Exactly the same!
And hey, what about Bill Clinton's consensual affair with a 22-year-old? How come we never hear about that anymore? That's so much creepier than a pedophile congressman engaging in mutual cybermasturbation with a high school student between House votes. Honestly!
Update: The Fox News drones have been pushing a line for the past couple of days about how the revelations about Foley were orchestrated by the Democrats, probably as part of a gay Mexlamofascist conspiracy funded by George Soros. Well, turns out the emails and IMs were actually passed along by a longtime GOP aide.
Was this "longtime GOP aide" a Democratic double agent trained by the Sierra Club and Planned Parenthood to infiltrate the Republican ranks? Or perhaps a space-age cyborg sent here from the future to thwart Denny Hastert's noble quest to return the World Eating Championship to American hands?
Only time and the impartial insight of Sean Hannity will tell.
5 comments:
Don't get too cocky, Otto. They'll be blaming this on Clinton's penis soon enough.
A Washington insider tells us that Ted Kennedy & Barbara Boxer invaded Mark Foley's bedroom late one night, replacing his well-behaved Republican penis with Bill Clinton's more lascivious member. From that moment on, it was only a matter of time until Foley lost all control and began to seek out homosexual trysts, under-age pages, and ways to defame the US flag.
Now it makes sense. Thanks, Mike.
I checked out the site, and the "correction" picture simply has no graphic. So we go from a graphic with a clear D to no graphic as a correction?
Not on purpose, huh?
If it's not a Democrat doing wrong, they don't want to hear about it.
I just tried to go back and read the comments there, and now it's some 360 long. I'm assuming someone higher than hus on the blogger food chain provided a link.
Post a Comment